Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 00:24:44 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Where to initialize certain locks... Message-ID: <20020402082444.GL93885@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020402031510.18134K-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020402025203.18134J-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020402031510.18134K-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andrew R. Reiter <arr@FreeBSD.org> [020402 00:18] wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: > > :On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > : > ::Your concern is valid, perhaps a macro that automagically makes > ::a sysinit to init a mutex? Sort of like the "SYSCALL_MODULE_HELPER" > ::stuff, but not as ugly? > :: > : > :How about something along the lines of: > > Sorry to reply to my own post, but I feel it necesary to mention that I > dislike having to pass in sub and order... Make it implicitly part of the macro. This code looks good so far, fix that and it should be good to go. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020402082444.GL93885>