From nobody Sat Dec 11 10:53:07 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E713318DB256 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) Received: from srv.fastssdserver.com (srv.fastssdserver.com [208.91.104.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JB4PR0dffz4gBF for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xpetrl@beepc.ch) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beepc.ch; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=J/Pa7zcBtmN7uVDqWOKFQn6tx8T9xZQSaTMqNDlzylA=; b=jT+kgzJxYg2JYB9hjTKpkcohyh NLJy0LvkC6pH1aMqdTLNynMLuesUx5F2ago0Grh6P6sR1H+k3lH8Pgk4mFauPWlBa3ZkENtHrhuuV xVJtNjqiVJpEbtowpQQqaOTP+7KhzZtasLpNMi4dM1CN2hMT4t4zr22KoTQJS+gGTGILvQ6kbHZ6n 1zt/YpXssYHrEtIFZH3Chy85UA/SjQfOl/ELWVTfIPjFqKtW8UkwyRW21jbMfv4Co9yG1jG5byHXo 4kY+h/Yke8Te0CnuQbW1XR1Ychycx6KSt/rx+cy0fXQrEaMIIO/sYfOeS/G9upBNVwG/112K6e31N k8B8WPhg==; Received: from [185.20.202.205] (port=34382 helo=[192.168.3.177]) by srv.fastssdserver.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mw00D-0005Up-R8 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:53:14 +0500 Subject: Re: Benchmarks: FreeBSD 13 vs. NetBSD 9.2 vs. OpenBSD 7 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6 vs. Linux To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: "beepc.ch" Message-ID: <593933b6-de09-f879-6e0f-f895a685555d@beepc.ch> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:53:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv.fastssdserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - beepc.ch X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: srv.fastssdserver.com: authenticated_id: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Authenticated-Sender: srv.fastssdserver.com: xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4JB4PR0dffz4gBF X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=beepc.ch header.s=default header.b=jT+kgzJx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xpetrl@beepc.ch designates 208.91.104.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xpetrl@beepc.ch X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.98 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:208.91.104.146:c]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[beepc.ch:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35913, ipnet:208.91.104.0/23, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[beepc.ch:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[beepc.ch]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.976]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; RBL_VIRUSFREE_BOTNET(2.00)[208.91.104.146:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[xpetrl@beepc.ch]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi, > Is there any tunibg guide(s) to make the default not conservative in a > regrding to several use cases like using as web server? - FreeBSD Handbook, Chapter 12. Configuration and Tuning - section 12.12. Tuning with sysctl(8) > Just to be clear I almost not used linux and always freebsd for simplicity > usage.. but I must say it makes me wonder > > Sami > > בתאריך שבת, 11 בדצמ׳ 2021, 11:52, מאת beepc.ch ‏: > >>> I am surprised to see that the BSD cluster today has much worse >> performance >>> than Linux. >>> What do you think of this? >> >> "Default" FreeBSD install setting are quite conservative. >> The Linux common distros are high tuned, those benchmark is in my >> opinion comparison of apples and oranges. >> >> Comparing "default" FreeBSD install with "default" Slackware install >> would be more interesting, because Slackware builds are at most vanilla. >> >> >