From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 22 18:36:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D191065673; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward9.mail.yandex.net (forward9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826088FC1A; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (smtp9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.35]) by forward9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CE61CCE5B68; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:20:46 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1324578046; bh=5BLT6yXaHaVZ01XZU/gRjj7Wm3HpnTJ9Fl9O1tI/wCI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PDhIdo2iz4QuHvjA/eLNWv2KkEkqPhR/kitLLCV+L/No6k/6Asokar2WSpcIhUMtp t/qH+ucNYeexBWPSYs9Umdafqe5AQO1Q+uv0laBIdtdmVlkSZfzLuD6zC05FO6gZzn pJOkXKVS5CEdHN1W9uHO6+wgICpGaQ9JmgHa97N8= Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7CF4C15204C7; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:20:46 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1324578046; bh=5BLT6yXaHaVZ01XZU/gRjj7Wm3HpnTJ9Fl9O1tI/wCI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PDhIdo2iz4QuHvjA/eLNWv2KkEkqPhR/kitLLCV+L/No6k/6Asokar2WSpcIhUMtp t/qH+ucNYeexBWPSYs9Umdafqe5AQO1Q+uv0laBIdtdmVlkSZfzLuD6zC05FO6gZzn pJOkXKVS5CEdHN1W9uHO6+wgICpGaQ9JmgHa97N8= Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id KjBm3eKZ-KjBmD8fr; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:20:46 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EF374E1.6050206@yandex.ru> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:20:17 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4EF1E3EF.9000405@eskk.nu> <4ef30e7b.gG6UGw+kkNWpdv07%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4EF2F920.8060007@FreeBSD.org> <4EF35F70.5070606@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Oberman , perryh@pluto.rain.com, Martin Matuska , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, leslie@eskk.nu Subject: Re: Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/x264 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:36:21 -0000 Chris Rees wrote on 22.12.2011 22:12: > On 22 Dec 2011 16:49, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" wrote: >> >> Kevin Oberman wrote on 22.12.2011 20:38: >>> The only thing I can think of is that the failing system is the >>> oldest, running 8.2 while the others were running 9.0-RC2 and >>> 9.0-Beta3. >> >> Yes, all is worked just fine (before the bash fix commit) there on >> 10.0-CURRENT i386. I saw that configure warnings too, but it still was >> built successfully. May be bash only needed on some older FreeBSD >> versions like 8.2, that didn't had all that improvements for /bin/sh, >> that were merged in 9 and 10, so maybe it is the reason why it builded >> fine on this systems w/o any additional fixes. >> > > True, since 9 sh supports == -- however I might label this compatibility > shims, rather than 'improvements'... > > Chris I'm talking about overall /bin/sh work, not only about compatibility with some `non-true' shells. I know many things was done and tests coverage is terrific. So may we imply dependency on shells/bash and specific configure patches only if OSVERSION < 900000? -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.