From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 26 12:41:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 962179FE; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED1115CE; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1WIdnv-000LfX-Cl; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:41:39 +0400 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:41:39 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Subject: Re: terminfo Message-ID: <20140226124139.GB79819@zxy.spb.ru> References: <5304A0CC.5000505@FreeBSD.org> <1392997589.1145.91.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <86ios31he9.fsf@nine.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86ios31he9.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Bryan Drewery , Warner Losh , Ian Lepore , Ed Schouten X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:41:41 -0000 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:55:10PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Warner Losh writes: > > I've had good luck with TERM=vt100 in those situations, but I use tip > > and apart from eating ^P it does a good job of being transparent > > enough... > > Am I the only one still using plain, unadorned cu(1)? I too