Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:06:18 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ACPI panic
Message-ID:  <50B34D2A.7060604@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121126104737.GC1469@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
References:  <20121122081831.GA1483@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <50ADFD75.10709@FreeBSD.org> <50ADFFB2.1000108@FreeBSD.org> <50AE057D.8060808@FreeBSD.org> <20121125140008.GA1497@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <50B244A1.1040800@FreeBSD.org> <20121126091101.GA1469@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <50B33693.2060000@FreeBSD.org> <20121126093704.GB1469@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <50B34484.1090807@FreeBSD.org> <20121126104737.GC1469@mole.fafoe.narf.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 26/11/2012 12:47 Stefan Farfeleder said the following:
> BTW, I noticed the ACPI_SET_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE code is pointless, because the
> DescriptorType is at offset 8 from the object start and gets immediately
> overwritten by the next pointer. However I don't think it's a problem.

Thank you.
To make things more obvious could you please also examine the objects like this:
x/9a <addr>
?

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B34D2A.7060604>