Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 19:58:15 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: junk <junk@volny.cz> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Documentation Correction Message-ID: <20081007175815.GA1032@gothic.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <48EA6DB9.6010900@volny.cz> References: <48E8F467.3050907@volny.cz> <20081006065101.GA1319@gothic.blackend.org> <48EA6DB9.6010900@volny.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:57:45PM +0200, junk wrote: > Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:07:51PM +0200, junk wrote: > > > >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/usb-disks.html > >> > >> 18.5.2 Testing the Configuration > >> ... > >> This is accomplished by adding these lines to /etc/devfs.rules: > >> > >> [localrules=1] > >> add path 'da*' mode 0660 group operator > >> > >> It should probably be [localrules=10]. I followed handbook and it didn't > >> work until I changed it to [localrules=10] (I found it elsewhere). > >> > >> > > > > Hello, > > > > I know it will not help things, but [localrules=1] works here under > > 7.1-PRERELEASE > > > > > Hello, > > yes, it does not help things. Important is, if [localrules=10] works for > both you and me (and for other releases of FreeBSD). I'm FreeBSD newbie > and it took me a lot of time to realize that handbook is probably not > quite correct (maybe some typo?). > > By the way: I have FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE > > So my question is: is it a mistake or not? If it is, correct it. > In fact, in the doc, [localrules=5] should be better cause /etc/defaults/devfs.rules already defines 4 rulesets. I just changed the Handbook on this point. However, [localrules=1] should work. -- Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081007175815.GA1032>