From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 12:10:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C191065670 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850AF8FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mAOCAmuE059810; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mAOCAmA8059809; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:10:48 +0100 From: Greg Byshenk To: Rink Springer Message-ID: <20081124121048.GB4609@core.byshenk.net> References: <20081124114248.GA4609@core.byshenk.net> <20081124114912.GA28709@rink.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081124114912.GA28709@rink.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on core.byshenk.net Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem with Adaptec 29320LPE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:10:51 -0000 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:49:12PM +0100, Rink Springer wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:42:49PM +0100, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > backuphost# camcontrol devlist > > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ch3) > > at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (sa3,pass1) > > at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,ch4) > > at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (sa4,pass3) > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (da0,pass4) > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 1 (da1,pass5) > Are these volumes perhaps >2TB ? If so, it won't work... we stumbled on > this at work a few weeks ago, and once we resized the volumes so that'd > all be <2TB, the controller worked fine... > > As far as I know, this is the only workaround - I couldn't see relevant > patches in Open/NetBSD either that might have fixed this issue :-( The volume da1 is indeed >2TB, but it is not connected to the controller; it (along with da0) is actually a RAID-10 array connected to a 3Ware/AMCC SATA controller. The Adaptec contoller is used only for the tape drives (the SDX-900V is AIT4; the SDX-1100 is AIT5), and they are <2TB. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL