From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 19:57:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76757587 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5166C244F for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56D51B949; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:57:26 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:35:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20130906; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201310021335.12332.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:57:26 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Michael Copeland X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:57:27 -0000 On Sunday, September 22, 2013 3:00:22 pm Michael Copeland wrote: > I noticed on freebsdnews that UEFI support could make it into release. > https://wiki.freebsd.org/UEFI > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/projects/uefi/ > > I've tested it as shown in the wiki link and it only reboots the vm. > I'm just wondering if that news was accurate or if it's still going to be a > long while till we have proper support for UEFI. It is not in the base tree yet, so it seems unlikely to make it in for 10.0. -- John Baldwin