Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:22:34 +0800
From:      Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>
To:        Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r468376 - in head/www/rubygem-kubeclient: . files
Message-ID:  <CAMHz58RnLoYdRi6FSLkkn4QgR7K2KTJBbvEBvQRb%2BCvg77GtmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <be95ea8b-dadd-0a3a-bc82-410e2098fea5@fechner.net>
References:  <201804261852.w3QIqEJE039537@repo.freebsd.org> <be95ea8b-dadd-0a3a-bc82-410e2098fea5@fechner.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
wrote:

> Dear Sunpoet,
>
> Am 26.04.2018 um 20:52 schrieb Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh:
> > Author: sunpoet
> > Date: Thu Apr 26 18:52:14 2018
> > New Revision: 468376
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/468376
> >
> > Log:
> >   Update to 2.5.2
> >
> >   Changes:    https://github.com/abonas/kubeclient/blob/master/
> CHANGELOG.md
>
> do you see a problem with this:
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15202


Hi,

Regarding the gemspec patch, only the first part is needed.
And swills@ proposed to use patch-gemspec everywhere.


> Or should we create a rubygem-kubeclient3 port for this?
>
>
I did not update this port to 3.0.0 because it should be committed along
with gitlab 10.7.x to avoid adding unnecessary rubygem-kubeclient2 port.

Regards,
sunpoet


> Gru=C3=9F
> Matthias
>
> --
>
> "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
> build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
> produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
> Rich Cook
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMHz58RnLoYdRi6FSLkkn4QgR7K2KTJBbvEBvQRb%2BCvg77GtmA>