From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Mar 30 17:42:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484DA2617E5 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48rfsg09stz3Jdq for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F0B2B2617D5; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F1B2617D4 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48rfsV1XX8z3Jb7 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A425E205D8 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02UHfdf5020839 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02UHfdcr020836 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245178] graphics/mesa-dri no member named 'CGFT_ObjectFile' Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:42:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245178 Mikhail Teterin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbeich@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #9 from Mikhail Teterin --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #8) > There are runtime issues with later llvm versions Then it should be using IGNORE=3D or BROKEN=3D instead of quietly dragging-= in an entire new compiler suit :-( For all we know, these unidentified "issues" may have been solved upstream already -- but, with the current "work around", we're unlikely to ever know= ... There is also a simple rule of thumb: if your port can only be built with a particular compiler, then the underlying code is broken... Years ago, the then-maintainer of OpenOffice.org created lang/gcc-ooo -- a version of gcc intended solely for building OpenOffice. It was ridiculous then, and it rem= ains ridiculous today... At any rate, the proposed patch allows the code to compile with llvm10, if = the compiler is ever allowed to run. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=