From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 28 14:43:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AD016A4F1; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3295D43D8C; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from [192.168.1.236] (really [70.32.199.60]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060728144252.CUAF4642.mta11.adelphia.net@[192.168.1.236]>; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:42:52 -0400 Message-ID: <44CA226B.1030608@savvis.net> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:42:51 -0700 From: maksim yevmenkin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxime Henrion References: <1153997829.12770@origin.intron.ac> <864px31eyz.fsf@xps.des.no> <86psfryvvo.fsf@xps.des.no> <44C8CFA2.3000400@savvis.net> <868xme28nt.fsf@xps.des.no> <44C90D22.5010607@savvis.net> <86slkmzx4o.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060728113705.GZ8070@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20060728113705.GZ8070@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to Use ddb(4)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:43:03 -0000 Maxime Henrion wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: >> Maksim Yevmenkin writes: >>> so far i only got one (successful) report. would people please give >>> it a try to see if work, so i can commit it. >> Please commit it. I don't see how it can do any harm. > > Yes please; I'd like to see this patch in HEAD as soon as possible so > that we can have as much coverage as possible since this is the kind of > fix that will be very desirable to MFC for 6.2-RELEASE. patch was committed to head yesterday. > BTW, does your patch also fix similar problems with kbdmux(4) and the > geli mountroot prompt? yes, it should. please let me know if you still have this kind of problems with kbdmux(4) and atkbd(4) thanks, max