From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Jul 11  6:58:35 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1134D37C25F; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA64577;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200007111358.JAA64577@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Merge of KAME code
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007110343110.87454-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007110343110.87454-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:56:15 -0700 (PDT), Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> said:

> If anyone has problems with the new KAME they've been keeping to
> themselves, or intends to exercise some kind of veto, please let me know!

I don't have any machines running current -current right now, but I'd
like to give my strong support for this plan.  Functioning IPsec with
IKE is going to become a necessity in the very near future, and if we
desire to maintain our momentum it's necessary to support both in the
active release train.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message