Date: 05 Apr 1998 17:48:24 -0500 From: Oliver Banta <obanta@unixgeeks.net> To: Tom <tom@sdf.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdate for 2.2.6? Message-ID: <877m537umf.fsf@aenima.unixgeeks.net> In-Reply-To: Tom's message of Sun, 5 Apr 1998 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980405145236.23782A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom <tom@sdf.com> writes: > On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > If patches were provided, say for soft updates, would they be > > integrated, or would thy have to remain "third party"? > > Would said patches work? > > Softupdates in current does not work. Someone would have to pull quite > the rabbit out of their hat to get softupdates to work in 2.2.x before > current. How do you figure? I thought Softupdates were based on 4.4BSD, so why would it be more difficult to port it to -STABLE? I haven't followed a lot of the recent changes in either tree, so there may be an obvious answer that I'm missing. Cheers, -- Oliver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?877m537umf.fsf>