From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 10:23:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76731106564A; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (hylle01.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C550E8FC13; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7213031E01C; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:23:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hylle01.itea.ntnu.no Received: from nobby.geeknest.org (caracal.stud.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::185]) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42B931E031; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:23:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:21:59 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: Alexandr Rybalko Message-ID: <20100304102158.GA8092@nobby.geeknest.org> References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: geom@freebsd.org, embedded@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:23:46 -0000 On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > Hi, > I wrote a module GEOM_ULZMA (such as GEOM_UZIP, but compression with lzma), in connection with this is an issue best left lzma > code in the file "geom_ulzma.c" or store lzma library separately. If separately, then where better? > > Maybe in future make lzma and gzip library kernel interface for embedded? > Then in one instance of code, userland can use compression via kernel. > What are the cons against combining uzip/ulzma into a geom_z/geom_compress module that can support different compression schemes? I think this makes more sense than having different geom modules for each compression scheme. -- Ulf Lilleengen