From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 20:05:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EAB106566C for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E088FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A319E027; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:05:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFA4319E023; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 SeaMonkey/2.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:06:00 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be >> rebuildet first? >> >> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof port >> reinstalling. > > Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the commit > was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because it depends > on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means that if you > just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right thing will > happen automatically. No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING as it was in case of jpeg-7. 20090719: AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. Miroslav Lachman