From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 15 15:52:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA15714 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 15:52:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA15689 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 15:52:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA18367; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 23:13:54 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199710152213.XAA18367@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Charles Mott cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetBIOS across a masquerading gateway In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Oct 1997 19:49:53 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 23:13:54 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [.....] > (2) If so, can such networking work across > the existing FreeBSD masquerading mechanism > in natd and ppp -alias? The only show-stopper I'm aware of is that the libalias stuff doesn't handle broadcast addresses too well (unless you fixed it in the last few months). [.....] > -- Charles Mott > -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....