From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 27 18:23:44 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA17723
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 18:23:44 -0700
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA17717
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 18:23:43 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA04453; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 18:23:36 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 18:23:36 -0700
Message-Id: <199507280123.SAA04453@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jcargill@cs.wisc.edu
CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199507280057.TAA08564@pongo.cs.wisc.edu> (message from Jonathan Cargille on Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:57:01 -0500)
Subject: Re: New 2.1.0-950726-SNAP available - come 'n get it!
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * This SNAP naming seems to be getting a bit inconsistent; if
 * 2.0.5-950622-SNAP was a "post-2.0.5" snapshot, shouldn't
 * 2.1.0-950726-SNAP be a "post-2.1" snapshot?

For snapshots, we are going to use the "next" version number from now
on.  This is because we now have two development branches, 2.2 (aka
-current) and 2.1 (aka -stable).  The naming change was needed to make
sure people can easily see which branch the snapshot is coming from.

 * Or is it just me?   ;-)   Or did I sleep through the 2.1 release?  ;-)

As far as I can tell, 2.1 is not released yet.  But who knows, I may
have slept throught it too. ;>

Satoshi