From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Oct 7 06:13:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA24530 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 06:13:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from ns.mexcom.net (ns.mexcom.net [206.103.64.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA24525 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 06:13:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eculp@mexcom.net) Received: from sunix (eculp@sunix.mexcom.net [206.103.64.3]) by ns.mexcom.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA12902; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 08:10:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <343A354D.717D1811@mexcom.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 08:12:45 -0500 From: Edwin Culp Organization: Mexico Communicates, S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.14 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andrew@ugh.net.au CC: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Big Expensive Link and Little Flat Rate Link - off topic References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk andrew@ugh.net.au wrote: > > Hmm...could be the title of a fairy tale.... > > This isnt speciffically FreeBSD related but... > > I have a network connected to the outside world via a 128K ISDN and a 2MB > link. > > The 2MB link is charged per MB, the ISDN at a flat rate for less than 40% > utilisation. > > The ISDN and the 2MB links go to completely seperate providers. I have a > squid parent at the end of the 2MB link. > > The question is how to make best use of the bandwidth? I want to use the > ISDN as much as possible obviously but dont want too much lag. > > The 2MB link router dosnt support BGP...in fact dosnt support much at all. > > Most of our traffic is web so I thought I could do something with squid. I > can get squid to balance between two parents but I would need it to > balance between direct from source and a single parent (I could add a > static route to the parent proxy to go via the 2MB link). > > Can I route say 70% of traffic one way, 30% traffic another way at a > FreeBSD level? > > Am I approaching this completely the wrong way? Any better ideas? > > Sorry for the off topic post, > > Andrew There was just a post on the squid list with a patch to do just that. I'll mail you a copy directly. Provecho ed