From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 30 13:17:52 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BD916A4B3
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD1743FDF
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])
	by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0BCCC66E3D; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F00AAB02; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:17:42 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Message-ID: <20030930201742.GB9478@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References: <1064894027.45333.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
	<40C5B5F6-F37B-11D7-A7E8-003065ABFD92@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40C5B5F6-F37B-11D7-A7E8-003065ABFD92@mac.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: INDEX build failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:17:52 -0000


--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:21:12PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 11:53 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >>>Did someone add a port called 'clean' or something?
> >>
> >>*looking suspiciously at edwin*
> >
> >Good look :-).
> >
> >[ 16:23 edwin ] Original commit
> >clean 3.2 sysutils
> >        New port: sysutils/clean; automatically remove unwanted files
> >
> >                New port: clean searches through the filesystem for=20
> >"temporary
> >                files" left behind by editors and the like which can be
> >                deleted.  The pattern of regular expressions is=20
> >controllable
> >                via a ~/.cleanrc.
> >
> >        PR:             ports/52881
> >        Submitted by:   Chuck Swiger <chuck@pkix.net>
>=20
> /usr/ports/devel/patch doesn't seem to conflict with the existence of a=
=20
> "make patch" target; I don't believe that the ports system should=20
> forbid a port named "clean", or "install", if /usr/bin/install was a=20
> port rather than part of the base system.

The reason is that the patch target is not used by bsd.port.subdir.mk,
but the others are, and that file also defines targets for each entry
in SUBDIR.  Both of these features are in use by the ports collection,
so neither can simply be removed.

> Should the port be renamed?

It looks like that's the only way to handle it.

Kris
--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/eeTmWry0BWjoQKURAooaAJ929tAOS9araim/naJL4njiL1DgtgCg37Kt
MtwgdosCmVM6OZGIeIepoQc=
=JYBA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG--