Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 21:21:52 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed Message-ID: <20120302192152.GQ75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4_R7BxmF0kZa2b%2B1xxPHDGYSffRHRT4UDrmwBZJ7upyw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120228211513.GD99283@azathoth.lan> <4F4D44F0.9060901@FreeBSD.org> <20120228223656.GF99283@azathoth.lan> <4F509414.3070605@FreeBSD.org> <20120302094710.GD75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4F51133C.7030902@FreeBSD.org> <20120302184931.GM75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAOjFWZ7v2YcuA%2Bye5xrCFJ8%2BF=gNq9og2QZ=k9YJ4wkeT-Ucyw@mail.gmail.com> <20120302190217.GN75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAOjFWZ4_R7BxmF0kZa2b%2B1xxPHDGYSffRHRT4UDrmwBZJ7upyw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2D20dG0OqTzqkNh7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:10:06AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Konstantin Belousov > <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:54:46AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Belousov > >> <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > And yes, I use a script that checks PCI devices on boot and symlinks > >> > libGL.so.1 and libglx.so to appropriate implementations. The only tr= ouble > >> > right now is that reinstall of libGL or nvidia driver ports requires > >> > manual fixing of the .so. > >> > >> Ah, but splitting the GL bits out into slave ports would fix that. =9A= :) > > > > No, it moves the moment of problem from mesa/nvidia update to mesa-libGL > > and nvidia-libGL update. And, libGl.so.1 from Mesa is already in the > > separate port, FWIW. >=20 > How? Unless the ports include the creation of the symlink (which they > shouldn't), then there is no problem anymore. >=20 > You install nvidia-gl port, you get libGL-nvidia.so installed. So nvidia-something port needs to install libGL-nvidia.so.1, and not libGL.so.1. >=20 > You install mesa-gl port, you get libGL-mesa.so installed. >=20 > You run the "alternatives" script to create the symlink (or manually > create it, or tweak a knob somewhere to create it), and then never > touch it again. >=20 > Update nvidia-gl port, only libGL-nvidia.so gets updated. The symlink > doesn't change. >=20 > Update mesa-gl port, only libGL-mesa.so gets updated. The symlink > doesn't change. >=20 > Where's the problem? Should I repeat what I said already, or can I just point to my other message ? The renames of the libGL.so inside the packages are orthohonal to package splits. The issue is that libGL.so.1 installed by both packages (graphics/libGL and x11/nvidia-driver). And not that the nvidia-driver contains some other stuff. --2D20dG0OqTzqkNh7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9RHc8ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jgHQCeJQ37iO3r4eIwRp/CIbWUgcVS 4j8AnjlJp6Mioe/TvJHbaV79hzfgc8Iu =WCF+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2D20dG0OqTzqkNh7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120302192152.GQ75778>