From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 21 06:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F2B16A43C for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7510143D4C for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4L6eGsl026478 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4L6eGeu026477; Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 GMT Message-Id: <200605210640.k4L6eGeu026477@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Babak Farrokhi" Cc: Subject: RE: ports/94861: update port net/p5-Net-Server to 0.92 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Babak Farrokhi List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/94861; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Babak Farrokhi" To: "'Sergey Matveychuk'" , Cc: Subject: RE: ports/94861: update port net/p5-Net-Server to 0.92 Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:04:59 +0330 Sergey, I believe the issue is solved and current release in ports tree is 0.93. So I guess this entry should be ignored. Thanks, Babak > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:sem@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 10:34 PM > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org; babak@farrokhi.net > Subject: Re: ports/94861: update port net/p5-Net-Server to 0.92 > > If you still want to be a maintainer for the port, could you find out what amavisd-new developers think about the issue? > > Anyway we could to make a repocopy and to have both ports: p5-Net-Server and p5-Net-Server090 for amavisd-new compatible. > -- > Dixi. > Sem.em.