From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 2 03:16:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5F516A417 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 03:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.movaqar@adempiere.org) Received: from kedah.mschosting.com (kedah.mschosting.com [202.75.42.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A887D13C447 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 03:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.movaqar@adempiere.org) Received: from [87.107.63.161] (port=51809 helo=attila) by kedah.mschosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IcYF0-0007lr-9S; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:16:11 +0800 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:51:38 +0330 From: "Bahman M." To: Eric Crist Message-ID: <20071002065138.477a7238@attila> In-Reply-To: <374E75AA-8954-4186-BBCA-F775730B1192@gmail.com> References: <20071001231334.71ddc9ac@attila> <374E75AA-8954-4186-BBCA-F775730B1192@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - kedah.mschosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - adempiere.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:16:15 -0000 On 2007-10-01 Eric Crist wrote: > On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:43 PMOct 1, 2007, Bahman M. wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of > > access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which > > is 1.2M requests per day. According to Apache website > > (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes > > about 120MB in size per day. > > > > Does somebody have similar experience with rotatelogs? Would you > > direct me to the proper tool in case it's not efficient enough ? > > > > TIA, > > > > Bahman > > I would recommend letting syslog handle the rotation. While we > don't have that many hits, it's always worked well. > Absolutely agree however I'm looking for a non-native solution to logging as the configuration will be migrated to a Windoze 2003 server in the end -just testing on FreeBSD. Sorry, should have already stated this at the start of thread. Thanks, Bahman