From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 13 10: 2: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194BC15062 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 10:01:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA16942; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:01:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:01:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Peter Jeremy , hackers@FreeBSD.org, gram@cequrux.com Subject: Re: New tests for test(1) In-Reply-To: <84928.934563326@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:50:54 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote: > > > I fully agree with this. If it can be cleanly added to the current test(1) > > (which it can), we should have it, even if it were JUST for the sake of > > portability. > > Ah, but I'm not proposing that we add new functionality to the existing > test(1). The code gave me a head-ache. I'm proposing that we replace our > test(1) entirely. > > Ciao, > Sheldon. > I don't see how our test is that bad. It's doing something right if the functionality is so easy to add... Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message