From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 17 19:44:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995B410656DC for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF98FC19 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8HJhHR8008494; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:43:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 608CC1232E; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:43:17 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20120917194317.GB43284@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andreas Nilsson Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:44:00 -0000 --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:04:20AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > Is there a specif PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does > > not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were > > the culprits so far) >=20 > There is no specific PR. We have not yet placed the requirement on our > ports maintainers to deal with clang. >=20 > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't > really help us all that much. Those are build failures. What about crashes? E.g. I've recently had crashes with x11-wm/i3 and x11/rxvt-unicode. Both problems disappeared after recompiling them with gcc46.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBXfVUACgkQEnfvsMMhpyU7tACePiL0WCeeQIhxg4da7E8OCpA1 CykAoKpTwIiH4xFyVo4/cpyuIqYc0AxC =U9YB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq--