Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:01:31 -0500 From: Mykel <Mykel@mWare.ca> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. Message-ID: <41A253AB.2080607@mWare.ca> In-Reply-To: <16802.17819.983480.763628@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0411221417120.787@oof.local> <41A2444E.2090609@jonny.eng.br> <16802.17819.983480.763628@canoe.dclg.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Gilbert wrote: >>>>>>"Joćo" == Joćo Carlos Mendes Luķs <jonny@jonny.eng.br> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> >Joćo> IIF they really have command queueing, I do believe. So, a >Joćo> bridged SATA drive will not have command queuing, right? > >Well... from what I've read, the WD bridged drives do have queueing >because they had an ATA-100 implementation of it. > Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the PATA <-> SATA bridge ultimately just a shift-register and nothing more? Myke
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41A253AB.2080607>