From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  2 06:40:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C34216A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  2 Nov 2003 06:40:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1002-2.lowesthosting.com (1002-2.lowesthosting.com
	[207.44.216.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4566643FAF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  2 Nov 2003 06:40:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from schnoopay@mackanics.net)
Received: (qmail 14686 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2003 14:40:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mackanics.net) (24.229.178.61)
  by 4me.cc with SMTP; 2 Nov 2003 14:40:51 -0000
Message-ID: <3FA51772.5090604@mackanics.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 09:40:50 -0500
From: Schnoopay <schnoopay@mackanics.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031019
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Sticky mouse with SCHED_ULE 10-30-03
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 14:40:53 -0000

>> Are you using moused?  Is this SMP or UP?  What CPUs are you using?
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Jeff
> 
> I am having similar problems after my last cvsup (10-31-03) also using a 
> USB MS Intellimouse. Mouse is slow to respond under ULE but fine under 
> 4BSD. The mouse feels like it's being sampled at a slow rate.
> 
> I am using moused, on a UP Athlon XP 1800+. I am running seti at home at 
> nice 15, but kill the seti process made no notable difference. I failed 
> to check objective performance as the interactive experience was truly 
> difficult to work with and I just wanted to get my work done. =]
> 
> -Schnoopay

I just disabled moused and told X to read from /dev/ums0 and the mouse 
problems are gone. I haven't changed anything else from when the mouse 
was "sticky" so I guess not using moused is a good work around.

-Schnoopay