From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 07:41:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95AEF9F8; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [208.86.227.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6820814B2; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:ff:100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C4FA1BDB; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:41:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 8C4FA1BDB Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 02:41:37 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? Message-ID: <20131205074137.GH44739@glenbarber.us> References: <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20131205152006.27766c1f@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEfPc/DjvCj+JzNg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131205.083242.74676021.sthaug@nethelp.no> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: bsd-lists@1command.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, erich@alogt.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:41:41 -0000 --PEfPc/DjvCj+JzNg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 08:32:42AM +0100, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > > Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? > > > Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? > > > Looks like a sign of weakness. :( > >=20 > > a sign? It is a weakness. FreeBSD did not force anybody to use fortune > > with the -o option. It was also possible to delete the 'offensive' > > files. >=20 > I see absolutely no reason why fortune -o should be removed. I suggest > that it should be restored. >=20 You are all welcome to create a port. Glen --PEfPc/DjvCj+JzNg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSoC4xAAoJELls3eqvi17QrTkQAITHub9S/PhLq/p/CvmCI8XA +aPShAEMx/KqsfwnTTO5w/hurMYtiHlJTkoNq/sjjzc04Dun5WpJvHjUFrSc/JC6 gwx3WAKWTN/LXIYumZ7yWs3A4PCcjU84YoFSmA9ENGoLeGbaZZjnhSQIKnlbspfu cOikEchKUZeKzEF3BKqe0mIABQf0OWLh3PGiqHqqyzdFFgQzAszpmAWBkQ6R10VA /zx0I7rG8EFERdz/d3uX+KCeEiWikqNpWoTdxcJlXLjL1DKRYqpc/vF2FcMBVhRv BsNJn7h1GXzZqunVno5pP+htReFll4QcKbUyYawClB3MeYHCb8rXjxeYJEmyTfZk BOJXa1qpr/Hifqq9+8mYPODB6FLbZA6XPRjVBb+3Q23zP2MziSwe2nOxd1oc4V67 LAFK2e86cU5p5QMI4/cgX5TRhrTgTQ+0t3tQ2zZ5v+gBx7scDlKs4xuuJaDDyN99 28xr/PHz2RP//WXIgcK/ut64KAkU30YE6C5CTJQBg4DQBR4K6/MuT2kK0Cn7Zs3m xpLAE0GMq/XbwmI1K1/0j5uWzFNb9UGbFRKz4h2KFDABErmDSJTHXMeY/5diRPvh kqNs3MmzNYCHfdDdZtm75cwHn61unLxF0UgLer1uUq4fAVFKybfm/3RjE9K6tz7P QBtB1CcO3xbgO3ZsS6dp =i+Wv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEfPc/DjvCj+JzNg--