From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 17:15:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C55E16A4CE for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:15:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D6143FE1 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:15:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mbueide@charter.net) Received: from mbueide ([68.114.178.229])hAC1DEAL086048 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:13:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mbueide@charter.net) Received: by mbueide (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:06:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:06:57 -0700 From: mike bueide To: FreeBSD-Newbies Message-ID: <20031112010657.GA958@charter.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-Newbies Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: ports and sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:15:12 -0000 I've been upgrading my sources and ports collection via cvsup for a while now. I have a simple question. Are the ports tied in anyway to the system sources? Or are they completely independent of one another? For example, I cvsuped the sources and the ports tree. Then I use portupgrade after updating the package database to upgrade a port before I "make world" or update my kernel. Would this confuse the process of rebuilding a port? The reason I'm asking is because I've upgraded my sources from the 4.8_RELEASE to 4.9_RELEASE. After reading some comments about it 4.9 on the questions list, I've become hesitant to actually compile it. -- mbueide (at) charter (dot) net .