From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  3 03:36:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447816A4CE
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Feb 2004 03:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl (amsfep16-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F7A43D2D
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Feb 2004 03:36:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com)
Received: from sitetronics.com ([62.163.150.222]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nl
          (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP
          id <20040203113642.GCOD1937.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@sitetronics.com>;
          Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:36:42 +0100
Message-ID: <401F8773.1020703@sitetronics.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:35:15 +0100
From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
References: <401F80EB.6030707@sitetronics.com>
	<20040203031252.A60217@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040203031252.A60217@xorpc.icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Line limitations with dummynet
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:36:47 -0000

Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> no, this is incorrect. By using 'mask's on a pipe, you can set
> the granularity of operation as you like -- per connection,
> per host, per group of services, etc. etc.
> 
> See the ipfw manpage.
> 
> 	cheers
> 	luigi

Thanks, Luigi,

I must have missed this part :) Reading over it again answers my question :)

Kind regards,

Devon H. O'Dell