From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 12:10:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4292916A4D2 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388C543D39 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OCAUkG093526 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:30 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7OCATM5093525; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:29 GMT Message-Id: <200408241210.i7OCATM5093525@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Tilman Linneweh Subject: Re: i386/69750: Boot without ACPI failed on ASUS L5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tilman Linneweh List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:10:30 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/69750; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tilman Linneweh To: Maxim Maximov Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/69750: Boot without ACPI failed on ASUS L5 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:05:57 +0200 Maxim Maximov: > > Did this Board boot without ACPI with an older version of FreeBSD > > (e.g. STABLE), is this a regression? > > This is unknown. I didn't have FreeBSD version older than 5.2.1 on this > notebook. I could, say, try to load from 4.x boot CD and see if it loads > fine. Is it needed? If yes, what version do you want me to try? There were some discussions about regressions when booting w/o ACPI in CURRENT (e.g. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403111246.12192.jhb ) So I guessed trying to boot a 4.x kernel would be a good test. regards tilman