Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:02:39 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: "Alex V. Petrov" <alexvpetrov@gmail.com> Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: firefox-109.0.1,2 (WebGL) Message-ID: <y1pc-s4kg-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <f9b42659-e626-2910-fe8f-c9ba56b34222@gmail.com> (Alex V. Petrov's message of "Sun, 5 Feb 2023 14:20:04 %2B0700") References: <f9b42659-e626-2910-fe8f-c9ba56b34222@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Alex V. Petrov" <alexvpetrov@gmail.com> writes: > Last versions FF have very low perfomance of WebGL. > > Compare with Chromium (https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html): > 10000 fish > Chromium - 60 Fps > FF - 6 Fps > (I have GF 1070) > > Some time ago these values were about the same. On Intel HD 530 (8086:1912) for 10000 fish I get chromium-109.0.5414.119: - 41 FPS under Sway - 60 FPS under Xwayland - 60 FPS under Xorg (modesetting, without compositor) firefox-109.0.1,2: - 30 FPS under Sway - 31 FPS under Xwayland - 29 FPS under Xorg (modesetting, without compositor) Maybe Firefox uses DMABUF[1] outside of Wayland and VA-API nowadays. If so for DMABUF to work on NVIDIA GPUs you need DRM[2]. [1] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-release/search?q=DMABufWebGL and widget.dmabuf-webgl.enabled in about:config [2] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/call-for-testing-nvidia-drm-kernel-module.87161/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y1pc-s4kg-wny>