From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 28 11:51:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02430 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:51:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02417; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:51:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA26420; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:51:36 -0200 (EDT) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: softupdates on / In-Reply-To: from Julian Elischer at "Jan 28, 1999 11:30:45 am" To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:51:36 -0200 (EDT) Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG #define quoting(Julian Elischer) // On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: // > Is there a strong reason for softupdates be a tunefs option, instead of // > a mount option ? This could be easily solved by a // // kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man" ^^^^^^^^^ I got your point, but can you list these arguments ? If it's only "he wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's a technical reason, I'd like to know. Thanks in advance, Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message