From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 3 17:18:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA23361 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA23356 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA18369 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 20:18:04 -0500 Message-Id: <199601040118.UAA18369@spooky.rwwa.com> X-Authentication-Warning: spooky.rwwa.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94 To: FreeBSD-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: help: 2.1.0 reboots with high network load In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jan 1996 21:59:57 +0100." <199601032059.VAA28160@gvr.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 03 Jan 1996 20:18:04 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > vmstat -i: > interrupt total rate > clk0 irq0 729041 100 > rtc0 irq8 932875 128 Incidentally, is this an artifact, or does this really mean a load of 228 interrupts/second for timekeeping? Is this a softclk/hardclk thing? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 592 8935, Net: witr@rwwa.COM