From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Feb 22 13:29:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C3D37B405; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc2-cdif2-5-cust35.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F194543FBD; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:29:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.12) id 18mhCw-0002K2-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:29:18 +0000 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:29:18 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Nik Clayton Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5-Stable Roadmap and the docs Message-ID: <20030222212918.GB8729@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Nik Clayton , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org References: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net> <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:46:50PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:37:50PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > Since at the moment RELENG_4 and CURRENT have some disparities, I think we > > have three options: > > > > i) Branch the doc/ tree; > > > > ii) Abandon the "doc/ reflects life with -stable" approach; > > > > iii) Muddle through adding s, etc and get ourselves in a state. > > > > Which one should we be going for ? > > (i) is likely to be a pain to manage. I don't think (ii) is realistic, > given that we're not suggesting that people migrate en masse to 5.0 yet. > Which leaves (iii)... That's what I thought. > > Also, I think now is a good time to kill all 2.x and 3.x stuff from > > the docs. I could be convinced that 3.x should stay - I'm unshakeable > > on 2.x, but that doesn't mean I'm about to barge ahead and do it. > > 2.x can go. I wouldn't personally lose sleep if we removed information > that was solely pertinent to 3.x either. Sweet. Ceri -- User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR? Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment. -- www.chatterboxchallenge.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message