From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Apr 28 18:29:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA02134 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:29:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from orcas.foghead.com (orcas.foghead.com [192.147.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA02128 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:29:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkins@foghead.com) Received: from localhost (junkins@localhost) by orcas.foghead.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA01941; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:28:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Junkins X-Sender: junkins@orcas To: Ulf Zimmermann cc: Calvin Meloon , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cisco router In-Reply-To: <199804282330.QAA01237@Gatekeeper.Alameda.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > This isn't freebsd related, just our network is freebsd. > > > > Our network here uses a Cisco 7200 as its main router for outside internet > > access. We had the router lose its flash memory and the only thing we can > > think of is that one guy was viewing the configuration when someone else > > was writing to it. > > > > Has anyone else had similar problems? > > Never heard of such a problem. And it would surprise me. But you might > wanna check with Cisco on that. > If you're running 11.2 or 11.3 code and are getting a message that the NVRAM is in use, you're running into a bug that I've seen. I am still trying to get cisco to respond with a bug ID. -Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message