Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:41:13 -0700 From: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> To: gahr@freebsd.org Cc: d@delphij.net, the_paya@gentoo.org, ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h Message-ID: <x2ka78074951003310341m6aae93fcw3ba559daad5a753b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <p2xa78074951003310338td17993a6nce83d72a913d2c23@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BACFE18.7010309@delphij.net> <86wrwylji0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BAD509B.3080805@delphij.net> <86ljdelhgd.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BAD62CF.6090901@delphij.net> <868w9elego.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100331102509.GI34892@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <p2xa78074951003310338td17993a6nce83d72a913d2c23@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I will merge an upstream change from zlib, which basically unexpose LFS stuff on FreeBSD, and I plan to keep the off_t bits =3D=3D 64. However, I = would highly recommend ports maintainers to push upstream fix for LFS64 definitio= n removal since they are wrong on FreeBSD On Mar 31, 2010 3:30 AM, "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr@gahr.ch> wrote: On 2010-Mar-27, 02:51, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> writes: > > So... ... Just to make it clear so that everyone knows how we're going to handle this: are you (src people) going to commit a fix to unexpose LFS crap or are we (ports people) supposed to fix each and every single port that supposes to be on Linux? The attentive reader will note a bias towards the former :) -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x2ka78074951003310341m6aae93fcw3ba559daad5a753b>