From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 10 20:16:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C11B02 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 20:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4B56A6 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 20:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so8886376ied.33 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=sB8GxG4dtC4izhOCurPlxoRIf3dN2VbVD/1Xw7wkgtY=; b=FsgG4us1qCQQjnqFEip0o6sFOm1QC+ka0cyMg8NBFt0M0zdNM15iNYcBAJAg95/l9L 90a6B47yEQZ+WV4SxmukMlDnWLMXZ2Bb31vdsfBPmzcsVhAxcVXK2vfGyoYZmdHgWjjI rKJzTKR+OviSUG5u4578ZlGOHAqQusggypSTy2In4IX/vyXrz3JU3F4XMbAcqisfCTmh IGwjUaixaNuq00qvpJrgch053Lpopk5x5LIjM6gP5obHI7XcCaGDqQufOIUBcLC4mya4 CZLingK1b3QfOPq9NArdpt+DMUi3XXRGHXpo3u6O3C4Nh1tA7Yl/913+W9g/VhHxOHxS UETw== X-Received: by 10.50.97.69 with SMTP id dy5mr2677036igb.3.1368217008189; Fri, 10 May 2013 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm111898igc.3.2013.05.10.13.16.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2013 13:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 16:16:46 -0400 From: William Bulley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.1-STABLE with xterm-292 oddity Message-ID: <20130510201646.GP10737@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2ssm5gzmDH8qWFL2ucMuNH0L9jaO2jLLPPF0sppW8PZklstHX4031fdLWZrglQvvmeKmR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 20:16:48 -0000 Recently (last week) I upgraded two systems to 9.1-STABLE. One system is i386 and the other is amd64. The upgrades were done about one day apart. While I have not checked every single commit, for the purposes of this problem, I am assuming these two systems have the same ports, src, and docs changes applied. This is how I began these upgrades: % cd /usr % rm -rf src ports doc % svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 src % svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/doc/head doc % svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports Note: these systems are desktop systems, not headless servers. The hardware of both systems is nearly identical, in particular, the graphics card (ATI) is identical on each system. After each upgrade, I wiped all my ports and rebuilt all the ports on the list of ports I use on these systems. While these two lists are slightly different, the "basics" are the same in both cases. I run Xorg on both systems along with open-motif and xterms: xorg-7.5.2 open-motif-2.3.4 xterm-292 The /var/db/ports/xterm/options files on both systems are identical. # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for xterm-292 _OPTIONS_READ=xterm-292 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=256COLOR DABBREV DECTERM GNOME LUIT PCRE WCHAR OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=256COLOR OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DABBREV OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DECTERM OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=GNOME OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=LUIT OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PCRE OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=WCHAR Also the /usr/ports/x11/xterm/work/xterm-292/xtermcfg.h files are the same on both systems. The oddity is this: on one system, when I iconify/minimize/close an open xterm window, the resulting small icon window holds a pixmap (48x48) that is monochrome. It resembles an outline drawing of an old style dumb terminal. On the other system, when I perform the same operation (close/iconify an xterm window), the resulting small icon window contains a color pixmap (48x48) of our Beastie! While I have an .Xdefaults file in my home directory on both systems, and there are XTerm resources configured therein, I do not configure any resources that control xterm icons. In fact, those .Xdefaults files are identical in the XTerm resource lines. I have rebuilt the x11/xterm port on the system with the color Beastie pixmap for closed/iconic xterm windows using the following steps: # cd /usr/ports/x11/xterm # make deinstall # /bin/rm -rf work # make install The results are the same as before, unfortunately. Interesting enough, one can see the color Beastie pixmap _inside_ the unstripped xterm executable on each system using this command: % strings /usr/local/bin/xterm | less The Beastie embedded pixmap appears after scrolling to about the 83% point (and runs up to about the 93% point) of the strings output. I am at a loss as to how one system is displaying the unwanted color pixmap while the other is showing the desired monochrome pixmap. Any ideas, or suggested avenues for further detective work, on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->|