Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:39:32 +0000
From:      h h <aakuusta@gmail.com>
To:        Holger Kipp <Holger.Kipp@alogis.com>
Cc:        Thomas Mueller <mueller6727@bellsouth.net>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2
Message-ID:  <868vpa5nor.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <891DD4D9-7138-4D4B-8108-C0C731694A59@alogis.com> (Holger Kipp's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:16:30 %2B0000")
References:  <201109262035.OAA17199@lariat.net> <20110927085332.A43681065672@hub.freebsd.org> <891DD4D9-7138-4D4B-8108-C0C731694A59@alogis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Holger Kipp <Holger.Kipp@alogis.com> writes:

> Am 27.09.2011 um 10:48 schrieb Thomas Mueller:
>
>>> From Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, due to past history, /usr is mixed-use. It normally
>>> contains both configuration information -- e.g. /usr/local/etc --
>>> and more volatile data such as users' home directories. This
>>> prevents /usr/local/etc, which also contains mission-critical
>>> configuration information, from being protected if you just protect
>>> /. Some proprietary Unices have fixed this historical flaw in the
>>> traditional hierarchy by moving /usr/local/etc to another location
>>> and them symlinking it back to where seasoned administrators expect
>>> it to be, thus honoring POLA. The three open source, old school
>>> BSDs (Free, Net, Open) have not done this to date, but it's
>>> something that should be considered in the long run. It would
>>> certainly make the creation of embedded systems easier, as well as
>>> enhancing security in multi-user systems!
>>
>> You mean users' home directories are under /usr/home rather than /home?
>>
>> I believe /home is more traditional, and decidedly my preference:
>> good to put on a separate partition so it won't be touched by a
>> system upgrade.
>
> Afaik /home has always been a symlink to /usr/home (unless you created a
> separate /home-partition within FreeBSD). So it is up to the admin what
> he chooses to do.

Interesting, there is no mention of /home in hier(7). I guess it can be
anything (without symlink) unlike, say, /compat stuff which needs at
least symlink for `emulation tree' to work.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868vpa5nor.fsf>