From owner-freebsd-mono@freebsd.org Mon Dec 14 06:56:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mono@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F2C4B080E for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CvXH51jsGz4VJt for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 391E24B0889; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: mono@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E754B0888 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CvXH511xLz4V5g for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166491D7C4 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BE6uGZU025630 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0BE6uGl1025629 for mono@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: mono@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238089] lang/mono: Update to 5.20 (5.10.0 dates to 2018-02) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mono@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Mono and C# applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:56:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238089 --- Comment #75 from Mark Linimon --- Here are the current results for the lang/mono5.20 port as recently committ= ed from the patches above. The following dependent ports now fail (these are regressions from 5.10): lang/fsharp emulators/mesen games/openbve games/openra In addition to the above, the following dependent ports also regress with lang/mono6.8 (but as committed via D23300, not the patches here): devel/dbus-sharp devel/newtonsoft-json graphics/nplot x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20 x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp30 I am going to need assistance to evaluate all the above. I am way out of my depth here. And I do not know if regressing these ports is acceptable (I h= ave been told that breaking lang/fsharp is *not* acceptable). I can attempt to cherry-pick the 6.8.0.105 patches from above and merge, bu= t my guess is that that will not fix the above problems. I am still working on the metaport so that prospective users can switch amo= ngst the 3 ports. (PR 251795). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=