From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  6 07:59:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4EC16A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 07:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (oahu.wurldlink.net [66.193.144.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C163443D55
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 07:59:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET)
Received: from oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (vince@localhost.WURLDLINK.NET [127.0.0.1])
	by oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i16FxkqQ070659;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:59:46 -1000 (HST)
Received: from localhost (vince@localhost)i16Fxkbs070656;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:59:46 -1000 (HST)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:59:46 -1000 (HST)
From: Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>
To: Dan Pelleg <daniel@pelleg.org>
In-Reply-To: <u2s65eknr5d.fsf@lark.auton.cs.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <20040206055415.D8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: questions@freebsd.org
cc: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:59:59 -0000

On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:

> Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> writes:
>
> >
> > 	After reading ipfw(8), I hope I have it correct that it's
> > like this:
> >
> > ipfw add queue 1 ip from any to any out xmit xl0
>
> Shouldn't "ipfw add queue 1" be enough?

	Don't know, that was what I was told to do by Luigi many years ago
except it was for PPPoE so I didn't have a static IP at all as that one
was interface specific.

> > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 384Kbit/s
> > ipfw queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask all
> >
> > 	Now I'm just confused how to do the IP portion so that:
> >
> > 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
> > 209.204.138.224-231
> > are not included
> >
> > but everything else in 209.204.x.x is as well as any undefined IP.
>
> the first match wins. So:
>
> pass from 192.168.0.0/16 to any
> pass from 209.204.138.224/29 to any
> queue 1 from any to any
>
> alternatively, use a "skipto" rule. Whatever fits in your ruleset better.

	A question on the /29 one, as my ISP seems to give the 8 IP's from
a /24 netmask, wouldn't the /29 actually filter out .224 and .231 from
working or does it basically excluse that range.


Cheers,
Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President             ________   __ ____
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
WurldLink Corporation                                  / / / /  | /  | __] ]
San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong                  / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin