Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 09:18:20 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Alton, Matthew" <Matthew.Alton@anheuser-busch.com> Cc: "'FreeBSD-fs@FreeBSD.ORG'" <FreeBSD-fs@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Dual optimized disks Message-ID: <1845.900746300@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Jul 1998 22:14:21 BST." <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF901776615@STLABCEXG011>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF901776615@STLABCEXG011>, "Alton, Mat thew" writes: >I am working up a hare-brained crackpot FS scheme which >uses 2 disks - one is read optimized and the other is write >optimized but are logically identical. Is this a good idea? s/2/N/ and it sounds like LFS with each segment on a separate disk, which performance wise can be a good idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1845.900746300>