From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Sep 12 16: 5:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D494637B403 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 54A7010F45A; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:05:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:05:39 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: ian j hart Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: kernel oplocks Message-ID: <20010912180539.B75181@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: ian j hart , "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <3B9FE8D6.40EBB7E@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B9FE8D6.40EBB7E@ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 11:59:34PM +0100, ian j hart wrote: > Samba now comes configured with kernel oplocks enabled by > default, implying this is part of the kernel. Can someone > confirm the status of this. ie is it established, or is it > a new feature. I wouldn't mind knowing where the source is. > A quick search revealed nothing. > I do not believe our kernel supports this in version 4.4 of FreeBSD, but you said you had problems even when you turned this off. The oplocks setting of "ON" should simply not work if you actually don't have oplocks support. Sounds like a bug in samba, what version are you using? -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message