From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep  5 21:35:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA20746
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 21:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA20734
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 21:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA16466; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 21:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A quick note to those without DNS resolvable mail hosts. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Sep 1997 22:34:07 MDT."
             <199709060434.WAA11474@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 21:35:28 -0700
Message-ID: <16461.873520528@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Quick question.  If I have a valid 'MX' record, is that good enough?  My

Sure, I can't imagine why it wouldn't be - sendmail is going to
look up the MX record first, so even if there's no A record it
shouldn't be an issue.

					Jordan