From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 17:35:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006141065673 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7948FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id p0EHMImL030574; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:18 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:18 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <201101141211.11674.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201101141211.11674.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Realtime thread scheduling changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:35:55 -0000 On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, John Baldwin wrote: > This is just a heads up that I've committed some changes to how the scheduler > handles realtime thread priorities. Please let me know of any issues you > encounter with nice, rtprio, or idprio. Note that as a result of these > changes, rtprio threads will no longer share priorities with interactive > timeshare threads. Instead, rtprio threads are now always more important than > non-rt threads. Cool - thanks for doing this! Is this something that could be MFC'able to 8? -- DE