From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 10:29:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C3337B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9F643F75 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h48HT8O9099178; Thu, 8 May 2003 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h48HT8cN099177; Thu, 8 May 2003 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 19:29:08 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030508172907.GB99104@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.112526.68226550.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508.112526.68226550.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:29:13 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:25:26AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> > Gordon Tetlow writes: > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> > : > Gordon Tetlow writes: > : > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : > > : > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers@. It looked like it was > : > : > further along than what's been posted here. > : > : > : > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on > : > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree > : > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have > : > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that. > : > > : > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past > : > few years. There's precident many ways. Can we please not argue of > : > stupid shit like this? That's why we get into these damn bikesheds. > : > : Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that > : point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't > : particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference. > > I guess the recent name hiding thread has gotten my bikeshed trigger > on 'hair' no. Lets put everything in /bikeshed and be done with it. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte