From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr 13 09:01:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA11535
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 09:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11523
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 09:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem17.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.47])
	by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA27134;
	Sun, 13 Apr 1997 11:04:34 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <335119F2.19A1@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 10:37:54 -0700
From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
CC: jbryant@tfs.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers
References: <16474.860906973@time.cdrom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> Seriously, the biggest reason things "rot" in FreeBSD is that nobody
> is actively maintaining them.  If you want to take on X.25 both
> now and for the forseeable future, I see no problem with resurrecting
> it.
>                                         Jordan

Is there a place for rotten FreeBSD thingies? Perhaps when the big
changes in 3.0 are over and the interfaces documented we can resurrect
many of them that don't require much maintainance (OSI, X25..and so on).

Pedro.