From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 5 10:52:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C550137B418 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fA5IpcP77719; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:51:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Kevin D.Wooten" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: devfs? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:40:40 MST." <01110511404004.08198@newton.cevio.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 19:51:38 +0100 Message-ID: <77717.1004986298@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <01110511404004.08198@newton.cevio.com>, "Kevin D.Wooten" writes: >When did ( will? ) devfs become the default for the kernel? about 5 months ago. >Also, is it >defaulted to maintaining the "old" list of files or only the "new" shorter >list? I don't understand the question... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message