From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  7 23:37:31 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B6116A420
	for <cvs-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851E913C478
	for <cvs-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: (qmail 6167 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2008 23:37:31 -0000
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO aldan-mlp) ([216.254.65.224])
	(envelope-sender <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>)
	by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <mezz7@cox.net>; 7 Feb 2008 23:37:30 -0000
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc.
To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:37:28 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200802071801.38477.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
	<op.t56f0ir79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.t56f0ir79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802071837.29761.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org,
	Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu)
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:37:31 -0000

=DE=C5=D4=D7=C5=D2 07 =CC=C0=D4=C9=CA 2008 06:10 =D0=CF, Jeremy Messenger =
=F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9:
> What about the users that who are using ports, not packages?

What about them? Which scenario do you foresee breaking?

> The PORTREVISION is needed or/and add info in /usr/ports/UPDATING about =
=9A
> reinstall these ports that depend on icu.

I don't think, PORTREVISION bump is needed in these cases -- only when the=
=20
port itself is changed. Any changes due to build-dependencies=20
(lib-dependencies among them) should be tracked independently.

 -mi