From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 16:38:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4DA8F9 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c47g@gmx.at) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6A3826 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.31]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M06gE-1UphOa3UE8-00uG3y for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:38:28 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Feb 2013 16:38:28 -0000 Received: from cm56-168-232.liwest.at (EHLO bones.gusis.at) [86.56.168.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 04 Feb 2013 17:38:28 +0100 X-Authenticated: #9978462 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+nTFQls06n+DixucTay+gVwY/HzJLP2EFNb7OT/H 1j0e8UguoPfJqC From: Christian Gusenbauer To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:40:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201301241805.57623.c47g@gmx.at> <201302041705.31461.c47g@gmx.at> <20130204163349.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20130204163349.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302041740.33014.c47g@gmx.at> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, yongari@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:38:30 -0000 On Monday 04 February 2013 17:33:49 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:05:31PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > > I was in contact with Pyun. We quickly found out that it is indeed a > > driver problem. Pyun solved it and will commit the fix within the next > > few days. > > > > There's only one (minor) problem open, which I can not tell if it really > > is one: Konstantin sent me an initial patch for the NFS code where he > > added an KASSERT(uiop->uio_iovcnt > 1) which triggers even with Pyun's > > fix. Without > > Is it > 1 or >= 1 ? I believe it should work fine with the condition being > > >= 1, it did for my test box. > > Anyway, I do not plan to commit this assertion for now. > > > that assert my tests show now problem at all. So is this a problem? > > > > Thanks guys (especially Pyun) for helping & fixing! > > > > Ciao, > > Christian. Hi! It's > 1. Ciao, Christian.