From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 13 01:17:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632BA1065672;
	Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:17:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from isearchbio.com (isearchbio.com [206.130.105.146])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243ED8FC12;
	Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (76-14-123-114.rk.wavecable.com [76.14.123.114])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by isearchbio.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8D1Hhpn030933;
	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:17:43 -0600
From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>
To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1221264777.5721.596.camel@pinot>
	<e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Sonata Biosciences, Inc.
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:17:09 -0700
Message-Id: <1221268629.5721.599.camel@pinot>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jahnke@sonatabio.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:17:44 -0000

On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:00 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:

> I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
> 

I agree, and have been using nspw for quite some time.  Still, if lpw
remains in the ports tree, it ought to play nicely with the various port
upgrading tools.

Frank